Yes, but as a camera, a working camera, it do it’s job with it’s IQ limitations. And that’s I ask for, not perfect images, but to be able to shoot the moment.
That’s why I extensively use pocket cameras, always with me, on pocket or my messenger bags.
If you look at photography master of 50’s, 60’s, 70’s , technical quality is laughable compared to what you could get out of a pocket camera today with raw files. That’s not the technical perfection that matter, it’s the instant.
ADDED: maybe in this case, Sony A7R is perfect for landscape shooting on a tripod (and I think it should be great at that!). But why invest in a small full-frame DSLR for that usage?!?
MENTAL HEALTH ISSUE: As a photographer for the last 15 years, having used many SLR, Nikon mainly, Pentax and Canon too, maybe I am a little ill to think that I have to see the subject, that my camera should react IMMEDIATLY, that I could shoot after burst with a working EVF/1OVF/Display. Maybe I am ill. Or not?!?
Started out doing photography at the age of 6 using an uncle's old 1940 kodak brownie box camera. At 15 years of age, I decided to buy my very own 1975 Praktica SLR camera. I now shoot with a Nikon D850. I do unpaid TFP and commercial paid work.