Studio Samples added to Sony Cyber-shot RX100 III First Impressions

The new studio samples are pretty bad, particularly WRT JPEG detail smearing. It produces significantly worse JPG’s at even base ISO than either the Canon G1X2 or the Pana GM1.

Some examples:

1, JPEG low-contrast detail smearing at base ISO:

a, vs. Canon G1X MkII :

Sony RX100Mk3 vs. Canon G1X MkII JPEG low-contrast detail smearing at base ISO

b, vs. Pana GM1:

Sony RX100Mk3 vs. Pana GM1 JPEG low-contrast detail smearing at base ISO.png

The other two cameras produce significantly less-smeared, better results.

2, RAW detail retention at base ISO (text readability):

a, vs. Canon G1X MkII :

Sony RX100Mk3 vs. Canon G1X MkII RAW detail retention at base ISO

b, vs. Pana GM1:

Sony RX100Mk3 vs. Pana GM1 RAW detail retention at base ISO

Despite the significantly lower-res sensor, the text on the G1X’s shot is equally readable than that of the Sony. The 16 Mpixel GM1 (which is, still, of lower nominal res than the Sony), on the other hand, produces _significantly_ more readable text.

I think I’ll go straight for the GM1 + 12-32 combo.

Source Article from http://www.dpreview.com/news/2014/05/30/studio-samples-added-to-sony-cyber-shot-rx100-iii-first-impressions